Sunday, September 15, 2013
An American Beauty paradise
Meanwhile, dear old Dad quits his job and goes for the fast food employment line while getting his only inspiration from the neighborhood homosexuals who are athletic, witty, kind, tolerant, fashionable, insightful and as close to perfection as you're going to get this side of the cross.
And the parents of our voyeuristic drug dealing hero? Why, that Dad is a repressed homophobe who collects guns and venerates Hitler. He's uneducated and boorish. He beats his hapless wife and his son, but does it because he secretly desires hot, steamy sex with the fellow next door. When this isn't realize, he must murder as all who suppress their homosexual desires must.
It's all you need to know about how modern liberals view liberalism and how they view those who don't conform. I say this because I'm in an ongoing discussion with a fellow on the thread I wrote about yesterday. Nice enough fellow, but one who has made it clear that bigotry is defined by not accepting same sex relationships. I've merely asked upon what authority or source he bases his claim that same sex relationships are entirely ethical. After three comments, he has yet to answer that, appealing to the Golden Rule and a not-too-subtle 'cuz it's obviously true, duh' sort of fundamental assuredness. And in the middle of it, he keeps throwing out some pretty humorous nods to the fact that the problem must be me: I might be ignorant, the victim of horrific relationships, in a marriage that might need an equal amount of condemnation (because nobody ever doubted that my marriage and gay marriage were on the same page). It's amusing, in a sort of 'Big Brother on the March' sort of way. Again, living out the American Beauty dream, with a little help from our friends and host at CAEI.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Jonah Goldberg was fond of referencing that movie in his book, Liberal Fascism as well.ReplyDelete
Sowell also said:
Without a moral framework, there is nothing left but immediate self-indulgence by some and the path of least resistance by others. Neither can sustain a free society. Disruptive activists indulge their egos in the name of idealism and others cave rather than fight.
I don't think I can top that.