Friday, June 16, 2023

Of bread and circuses and convictions

The Right v. the Left
We all know the reference to bread and circuses.  It means providing the masses with superficial appeasement to keep them in check.  Of course in our wealthy, leisurely age, the bread and circuses morphed into sex and drugs.  Mere bread and circuses would not do.  Though in some ways, they do still play a part.  Consider movies or athletics for examples. 

Which brings us to now.  I just did something I've not purposefully done since I graduated OSU in 1990.  That is, I passed on purchasing tickets to this year's Ohio State Buckeyes football season.  Every year, since I was young, I've managed to go to a game, or at least purchase tickets.  Until now. 

Why?  Because first: prices.  The prices are quite staggering for what you get, and at a time when the cost of living is still back breaking, despite media narratives to the contrary.  It used to be if you were an alumnus, each year you got tickets the seats were better, and better, and better.  That stopped years ago.  Alumni means nosebleed.  If you want better, you pay extra, and I mean extra.  Given the spate of significant expenses we've had to absorb this year, can we justify such football tickets? 

Yes.  That would have been my answer in years gone by.  It's not like every year of my life saw me wallowing in endless money.  Nonetheless, I always found a way to pay for at least one game a year.  That way I took each of my sons, and sometimes went with my wife, and even took my mom and dad once.   

But this year?   No.  Ted Cruz said something the other day that I found disappointing.  He said boycotts don't generally work.  That's because people might grind their teeth and fuss, but in the end they'll be right back at the ticket counters putting money into the organizations' bank accounts, no matter what.  

Which really isn't true.  It tends to be true for conservatives, not liberals.  Liberals will declare unholy jihad when told, and burn the organization to the ground.  I remember that with the Chick fil-A debacle back in the day.  When the LGBTQ community began going after CFA, some within their ranks would say they still loved the food, but didn't like the establishment's bigotry.  But after a few years, you couldn't find anyone in that movement not wanting to burn CFA to the ground.  And if someone dared cross the battleline and order a chicken sandwich?  Retaliation was sift and merciless.  I'm recalling when Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey mistakenly ordered a CFA sandwich during June one year.  He quickly repented his grave sin. 

So no, such boycotts and tactics work like a charm - for liberalism.  Just see the morphing of CFA.  That's because liberalism is a revolution, a new religion, a movement.  It has specific dogmas.  It has clear promises.  It has convictions.  It is prepared to do whatever to win.  If you're part of it, you're part of it top to bottom.  And you have the passion, zeal and fanaticism that goes with such revolutionary movements.

Conservatives?  Not so much.  When conservatives do move, it's often by those we normally wouldn't want representing the cause.  That's because the bulk of conservatives see what's happening as not worth giving up the game for, or giving up the movie experience for, or giving up our favorite restaurant for, or giving up that precious Netflix binging for, or whatever.  We're Rocky in Rocky III.  The Left is Clubber Lang.   

So I looked at what OSU has become.  I recall the recent OSU president sending endless messages to the student body, trashing conservatives, Trump and anything right of center.  I think on OSU moving as radical left of Stalin as the left will go.  I think of my son, working hard to achieve the highest honors in his degree, finding out that OSU will not recognize such accomplishments during graduation on the off chance it hurts someone's feelings.  Because we can't get enough of being a loser country filled with losers.  

True, during the Kaepernick kerfuffle, the OSU teams did not take part, and that is a feather in their cap.  But that doesn't offset the fact that OSU is actively against what I value.  When I was in college?  Sure, every professor was left of center.  But the school was still a school.  Those debates were in the class, not presented with official OSU president's letterhead. OSU wasn't in front of the cameras jockeying for the USSR (no matter how many would have liked to).   It was not an indoctrination camp.  Free speech and the free exchange of ideals were still promoted in and out of the classrooms.  In fact, per my sons, the school itself was worse than most of their classes.  

So for the first time in my adult life, I passed.  No tickets this year.  Yes, staggering inflation and cost of living would make it tough.  But in years past I would have pulled strings to make it work.  Not now.  Until conservatives take a stand and stop watching the movies, and frequenting the stores, and following the teams, and given money to those forces that want us and our values erased, we will lose.  If that's what we choose, let's just hope for the sake of our grandchildren that the movies and games and menus were worth it. 

The only way to win


14 comments:

  1. Amen! I haven’t had Starbucks in years as the CEO said if you supported traditional marriage, don’t get your coffee there! And I said, okay! (I don’t even consider that a boycott actually, just honoring a request) However, I know several daily Starbucks drinkers who would say they support traditional marriage and even consider themselves devout Christians, and I’m like WHY DO WE GIVE MONEY TO CORPORATIONS WHO EXPLICITLY HATE US!?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People are not willing to suffer the small comforts in life. Even as Christians we have no idea how to take up our crosses. We have almost no practice doing it and will gladly go back for more Turkish Delight when given the chance.

      Delete
    2. The fact that "don't give money to people who hate you" is a controversial statement among the right does much to explain how we got to where we are now.

      Delete
    3. I was thinking the same thing along similar lines. That is, we act as if it is some real sacrifice to stop going to a coffee shop or not buy football tickets. And yet, compared to what far too many conservatives and traditional believers are prepared to do, those are tremendous sacrifices. Which speaks volumes.

      Delete
    4. I understand that giving up coffee, football tickets and/or Budlight is nothing to what others in the world sacrifice for their faith we need to remember that we have been blessed in this nation and that we are not being martyred for our faith, but when ever we can we need to stand against evil even in small things. We are fortunate that in this country that we don't have to sacrifice more than what we have so far for our faith, but lets not belittle even the small things. When we fight against evil in the small avenues afforded us, we will become stronger to fight greater evils when the times come.

      Delete
    5. Is it a controversy? I think at times it was such a flood of alerts about who did what, I would believe that a lot of conservatives forgot or lost track of who they need to boycott. That's why I think Matt Walsh was onto something about picking a single target and focusing on it. (I mean I barely do shopping in the first place and generally aim for local shops so rarely do these calls affect my habit in the first place.)

      Delete
    6. There are two ways in which it is controversial.

      The first is that people start to balk the second they have to make a real sacrifice. For example, there are many people who would never dream of getting an overpriced coffee in the first place who say "yes, boycott Starbucks!" But many of these people will start hemming and hawing when you ask them to cancel their Disney+ and Netflix accounts. "But not everything is woke on there!" "There's so much work out there that it's unreasonable to ask me to get rid of everything woke!" Both true, but neither negates the fact that you can easily get entertainment elsewhere, and hence canceling your subscriptions should be a minor sacrifice.

      The other way it is controversial comes from the establishment. They are always looking for an excuse to give in. The Bud Light thing is unusual in that the base DIDN'T go along with it this time. Usually it would be people saying "hey, they made some commercials with motorcycles and soldiers, that shows that they learned their lesson. So it would be cruel and vindictive to continue the boycott." But you see it in other areas, ex. people looking for excuses to recommend watching the new D&D movie or comic book movie or Star Wars show, despite coming from a woke franchise of a woke company and largely made by woke people.

      Delete
    7. Rudolph, agree very much with the subscription thing. We dumped Netflix years ago, then Disney, and just this year Amazon Prime. As with most things the idea of cutting it off was harder than the actual doing of it as nobody misses what we don’t have. I am simply aghast, both at myself for dragging my feet on Amazon, and at all the conservatives I know who won’t give up yearly trips to Disney let alone Disney Plus!

      Delete
  2. When we boycott the Bud lights, the Disney worlds and such we are NOT giving more money to these organizations to spend to push these evil agendas. Why give them money to fight against the people of God?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Would we patronize Home Depot if they provided the wood for a crucifixion?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Depends on who is being crucified. If we are talking about THE Crucifixion I'd have to boycott Home Depot. On the other hand, if we are dealing with predators who molest children.....well.....Yes I know I'm a bad person for even THINKING of nailing a child molester to a tree. Oh well. I'm already on Shea's list.

      Delete
    2. (Tom New Poster)
      Dave, please, no crucifixions! We can't go erecting crosses, even for pedophiles.
      Gallows work just as well, and are reusable, too :)

      Delete
  4. Ted Cruz has to condemn boycotts. He's still beholden to the dogma that conservatives need to extol the virtues of large corporations. And Ukraine. And Israel.

    A few weeks back, he was condemning Uganda's anti-homosexuality laws. When it comes to the promotion of American ideological imperialism, Republicans are far too eager to ally themselves with Democrats.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Boycotts work if everyone gets on board, so to speak. The Montgomery Bus Boycott worked because people were all in. I’m liking this Bud Light boycott because it’s showing the real possibility of success when people decide to just do it. I think a lot of people don’t think they work because there’s not enough sustained effort over time.
      As far as Leftists go, hatred is a powerful motivator to continue a boycott or a ruthless campaign against traditional values. Conservatives mostly just want to live their lives and aren’t nearly so motivated. I hope the Bud Light backlash continues. It would be a shame to waste such motivated disgust.

      Delete

Let me know your thoughts