And I noticed the tower had fallen and killed many people. In my distress I turned to them, and Billy Graham told me there is much suffering in our fallen world. I am no doubt suffering too. In fact, if I'm honest, my whole life has been missing something, and as I look at that tower I can see the problems of the world that have always been. But it's time I admit that the only solution to my distress and depression is to turn to God by repenting and coming to Christ Jesus, to make Him Lord of my life, and then I will find what my life has been missing. Oh, and then I should make sure I find a local church and become part of it.
I then turned to Pope Leo, who assured me that the world is filled with injustices and suffering. He likewise assured me that God would be there for me in my own struggles and suffering, to give me the sense of His Presence, and to bring us all to be united as one family in this world. Once I realize that, I can then get busy and start working on how to make sure no more towers like the one at Siloam fall, or that oppressive regimes can no longer mingle the blood of the innocent with their sacrifices as Pilate did.
I thought of that when I heard some of the words of Pope Leo in Spain. I've been listening to Pope Leo quite a bit, eagerly waiting that moment when he finally says 'Yes, Griffeys, the hell you went through to become Catholic was worth it, for there is no more pressing need in all creation than walking with God through Christ in the Catholic Faith.' Or similar.
Instead, I heard things that reminded me more of a Catholic version of Rick Warren's A Purpose Driven Life, with a touch of socio-economic and political concerns tagged on the end. Not horrible stuff, but in the end, I just keep getting the impression that it's all about me. Not me in the sense that it's imperative I repent and draw near to God. But somehow as if God is a means to an end that ultimately comes back to me.
In fact, it dawned on me that if it was up to the last couple popes we've had, I never would have become Christian, much less Catholic. Not that they don't act like Jesus or God or the Christian Faith are important, at least from a Catholic POV. They just aren't - necessary, at least from a modern POV. Or at best they aren't exclusively necessary. And there never seems to be any demand on me at all, apart from seeking justice for the oppressed and the immigrant and concerning myself about the world's climate and economic woes. Big, lofty problems that never really put me on the spot for my own personal life choices and behaviors.
Out of strange coincidence, as I've listened to Pope Leo, I saw an old clip of Billy Graham a few days back. It's been a long time since I heard him. It brough back memories. Even as an agnostic, I always respected Rev. Graham. As I told people then that I didn't believe in Christianity, but I knew he did. And that meant something. Especially compared to other prominent celebrity ministers in those days.
Which is why, when he had his famous Crusades on television, I would sometimes watch. Even in college, if other roommates were out and about, I'd turn him on and listen. I must admit - and I know people will probably find all sorts of problems with his theology or ministry style - but when he preached, something often stirred inside me. He said much of the same thing the last popes have said. Hurting people, hurting world, injustices and all, feeling lost and alone. But somehow he pointed past the worldly and material to the New Jerusalem (though I wouldn't have identified it as such).
And he made it clear it wasn't a blank check. I had to meet God halfway. A covenant, so to speak. A new covenant, but covenant nonetheless. God is eternal love and grace and forgiveness, but not on a one-way street. I would have to confess, to step out, to make Jesus Lord of my life for the world to see. And let me tell you, as an agnostic, the thought of stepping out and saying I believe in Jesus publicly was like begin asked to go to the front of the class and do a calculus problem on the chalkboard. Because something about the invitation made me think that would be a major decision on my part, nobody to hide behind or nowhere to run. It was me and my decision or not, and I would have to live with the consequences one way or another. Let me tell you, that was a powerful idea.
Despite the dread I had when pondering that, I often entertained the thought. I think, IIRC, I once actually called that hotline they had at the end of the broadcast. I don't recall if anything happened. But that's how much it touched me. I should say, as a Protestant minister, I often got the same zingers in my soul when I listened to Fulton Sheen. I had never heard of him growing up, but in Louisville there was a station that showed reruns of his old TV show. Wow, could that fellow preach. As one from a denomination that put a huge premium on mach schau when it came to sermon delivery, I often stood in awe of Sheen's communication abilities. A reputation Catholic priests were not always associated with.
And, like a Catholic Billy Graham, he laid it on the line. He didn't shy from the issues of the day. Far from it. But it was always wrapped in higher things. It was, you might say, a reminder that however many towers we lament or authoritarian atrocities we decry, we need to make sure we - that's me, Dave Griffey - are right with God. And it isn't going to arrive in the mail with a picture of Ed McMahon on the envelope. I was going to have to meet and accept God's gift; to be prepared to make the call and follow through.
I just don't get that from so much of the Church today, including its popes. As I said here, dignity seems to be the big idol before which our leaders bow (yes, I saw the headline). But is seems to reinforce that modernist idea that it's really all about me isn't it. God's here to give me a purpose driven life, which mainly means, in terms of obligation that I get with the picture and fix the things of the world, as opposed to come forward and confess Christ before men, or repent and sin no more.
I should add one more thing. I was chatting with one of my sons, as you're aware I often do. We were talking about the heavy emphasis on such things as 'fix the problems of the world will you' that is everywhere today. He said that's one of the things that drags so many younger people down. The idea that they have no business being anything but miserable unless they invest themselves in fixing vast geopolitical problems that have evaded the leaders of the world since time immemorial. Again, I thought of that when I reflected on Pope Leo's call to trust that God loves us, but make sure we use this realization to get out there and be those social justice warriors that the world wants. As opposed to focusing on anything terribly eternal in our own personal considerations.
And now a few passages to ponder:
For this reason, he added that those who allow themselves to be enlightened by the Gospel “also develop a critical perspective regarding a social system that does not place the person at the center and gives rise to situations of injustice and existential poverty on various levels.” Pope Leo XIV
"True repentance is a turning from sin... Humanly speaking, it is our small part in the plan of salvation. Our part is repenting. God will do the converting, the transforming, and the forgiving." Billy Graham
When the Church gets bogged down with false gospels about improving the world, it is usually the actual gospel that gets marginalized. We Catholics desperately need to have a discussion about what is, and isn't, the mission of the church in this world. I really don't think that Jesus sent his followers out into the world to make it a more just, peaceful, and equitable place --- or to make sure everyone has a good health plan including Dental. That is certainly not what St. Peter had in mind when he addressed the men of Jerusalem.
ReplyDeleteThe Catholic Church is in need of a serious re-boot, or it is going to dry up and disappear (which is what it will deserve if it doesn't alter course, and soon). --- G. Poulin
That's a big problem we've seen. As Protestants, we still had this idea that Protestants had lost something of the 'sacred v. profane', and it was the Catholics who still, through everything, maintained that 'look to eternal things no matter what focus' far more consistently as a result. So it's been stunning to see that, in many ways, those old stalwart Protestants (not the progressive or fundamentalist) tended to keep an 'eye to the eternal' more than the modern Church, which seems forever focused on the political, the social, the economic, and quite frankly, the not rocking the boat of the modern secular age.
Delete(Dave if you delete this comment I understand and won't hold it against you.)
DeleteI've seen more than a few commentary on examining the consequences of opening trade with China and a common conclusion among many is though we hoped to export liberty China, it has instead exported authoritarianism to us.
It does make one wonder if on reflection, when Protestants flooded into the church, did they become more Catholic, or did it become more Protestant.
Mass immigration and shifts in population seems to affect more than countries. Even if the borders are spiritual more than physical.
Don't worry Nate, I tend not to delete comments that are trying to tell the truth. I don't know how much impact that the converts had on the Church as a whole, however. It is a pretty big Church. I fear it's the opposite. That many came into the Church - sometimes as they testified - and imagined it was this bulwark against the secular sellout they witnessed in so many Protestant denominations. And then they realized the truth of it all.
DeleteOne thing I would like to see is a less worshipful attitude towards church leaders on the part of Catholics. Not everything that comes from the mouths (or pens) of bishops and popes must be regarded as brilliant and prophetic. The latest papal encyclical, for instance, is little more than a collection of hackneyed platitudes, bad theology, and examples of Scriptural illiteracy on the part of Leo. Yet everywhere I look, I see Catholic commentators gushing over the stupid thing. Like they do every time. We need to re-think a few things. ---- G. Poulin
ReplyDeleteThat's a fair point, and one that a former Protestant, especially Evangelical, will understand. With that said, I don't mind admiring those who stand firm and do the right thing. But you're right, I fear much of the modern Catholic Church has decided to take the worst elements of our contemporary celebrity culture and say that's how we need to be.
DeleteGenuine question, Dave: (and please take my query with the tone of charity and sincerity I'm intending :) ).... why do you seem to seek and need the approval of the Supreme Pontiff? Is not the discovery of Truth and conversion good in and of itself? The last two popes have definitely been disappointing, especially after having JPII and B16 at the helm, but it doesn't change the fact the Catholic Church is what it is. We are all suffering with and from its leadership currently. It's an unpleasant cross to carry to be sure, but it's one we have been given in our lifetime.
ReplyDeleteShort answer: If I attended a church, I wouldn't want the pastor to get up every Sunday and say it's no big deal. Long answer: Because as a non-believer, I never really believed there was some slam dunk evidence that proves religion is false. I knew better. What I wanted was evidence that it didn't matter one way or another. And I'm afraid that I would have been elated at not just the last two popes, but the Church as a whole for some time. Because it isn't like Pope Leo is kicking against the goads where the dominant Catholic preferences are today. They simply are saying what Catholics today, in most cases, want to hear. Because of recalling my views as a non-believer, and those old Evangelical sensitivities that put a high premium on being a witness to the World and making disciples of the nations, that goes down tough. Not to mention what we went through as a family to become Catholic in the first place. That was the reason for us jumping over to an Eastern Orthodox mission church in the area for a few years.
DeleteThat is fair. And many reasons you mentioned are pretty much why I choose to politely ignore the higher ups. Although, I grew up on the edge of a rather progressive-leaning diocese (though benefitting from all the orthodox priests sent out to the hinterlands where we resided), so ignoring leadership unless absolutely necessary was a default setting for a long time.
Delete