This is hardly new. In recent years it has become an almost regular topic of conversation - just what in the past couldn't be made today? What comedians of the past wouldn't work today? What television shows couldn't be produced today? What cartoons of old wouldn't get off the drawing board today?
The funny thing? When I was young and growing up, 1970s and 1980s even into the 90s, it was just the opposite. I remember entertainers and journalists and professors and English teachers and just folks in general often saying how the latest movie or television show couldn't have been made in the past. Sometimes owing to technology. But often owing to changes in morals and an emphasis on the sacredness of free speech and artistic expression; an open mindedness to differing views and beliefs and lifestyles and such. The emergence of our truly diverse and inclusive society that post-war liberalism was building. Not that they always liked the results, but they conceded the tidal surge of emphasis on complete openness to all views and expressions was having an effect.
But today, it's how many things in the past - including from that age of endless tolerance and diversity and inclusion - would never be allowed today? Often because of activism by the same ones who once cheered how we were so able to push the boundaries and produce the unproducible from days gone by. Think real hard on that, and you begin to realize that, in the immortal words of Foghorn Leghorn, we've been flimflammed.
