Saturday, March 11, 2023

A dose of clarity

The whole Walgreens and Gavin Newsom story brought to mind this little verse from the Scriptures:

[N]o one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.  Revelation 13.17

Remember what I wrote the other day.  The lines should be increasingly clear. 


  1. So, it's Newsom's view that Walgreen's is obligated to defy the law in other states?

    1. That's how I read it. I didn't want to comment on that because I wasn't sure if I was getting the gist of it or missing something on some legal level. But it seemed to me that Walgreens was merely saying it would defy the law in various states, and for Newsome that was a no go, since apparently a lawmaker need not uphold law?

    2. (Tom New Poster)
      Hair Newsom is a drama queen: he knows his comments will go nowhere, but he has to please his Cal donors and impress equally woke hedonists in other states, if he wants a run at the Democratic nomination.
      "Looky what (useless thing) I did! Vote for meeee!"


Let me know your thoughts