Bad arguments

Prove nothing.  Simply because The Washington Post criticized the factual basis for a liberal candidate among a selection of liberal candidates means nothing at all.  It certainly wouldn't prove the media is liberal, but it wouldn't prove it isn't.  And yet this is hoisted up as a compelling argument?  Really?  By that standard, FOX News is Fair and Balanced because it has criticized various Conservative Republicans over the years.  I wonder if the esteemed The Ring of Fire Network would argue that?  If so, it would be just as wrong to do so.