Jimmy Kimmel and the problem with Gun Control advocacy in the wake of Santa Fe High

Unless there is something missing in the evidence we've been exposed to, nothing Kimmel or any mainstream gun control advocates have proposed would have stopped the shooting in Santa Fe.  The shooter had no red flags.  He used shotguns and handguns that are not being discussed by most Gun Control advocates.  His father legally owned the guns.  Nothing that gun control advocates repeatably propose would have prevented this.

Did that stop political pundit and activists Jimmy Kimmel from repeating bumper sticker slogans that are demonstrably wrong?  Did it stop him from attacking those who wouldn't support his proposals that wouldn't have made a difference? Not a bit:

I give you the glaring problem in the gun debate today.  So many gun control activists seem to think nothing about actual facts, data, truth or reality.  They vomit the same talking points whether the talking points apply or not, and then use carefully edited attack pieces to exploit the latest tragedy for political gain, almost as if to deflect from the glaring fact that all of their proposals wouldn't have stopped the shooting.

Shame on Mr. Kimmel, and all who won't admit the issue is bigger than legislation that would not have made a difference in the very tragedy he is referencing.