Tuesday, May 16, 2023

Russ Moore and religious clickbait

Distraction is the basis of illusion
So my old classmate Russ Moore stepped forward a while back to demonstrate just what a court prophet in our new era will look like.  Russ isn't like some who simply align blindly with the leftwing colossus of our time.  He continues to keep one foot in the old time religion while trying desperately to stay friends with those whose feet are firmly planted in the profane. 

That is, after all, one of his selling points for the modern Left.  He maintains a 'still a Bible believing Christian at heart' identity while continually assuring the Left that all its hatred and accusations against Christians, especially Evangelicals, are spot on.  One of the few times the Left will spot you some dissenting views is if you make sure to confirm its hatred and contempt for others in your hated demographic. 

But how do you balance that 'I could never attend a gay wedding, but I sure could party at your gay wedding reception' approach without losing the old timer side of the aisle?  Easy.  You get back to basics now and then and do what worked in the past.  A little trick called distraction. Pay no attention to this hand, just look at what this other hand is focusing on.  Magicians use it all the time. 

In Russ's case, this is accomplished by getting our attention away from his mounting allegiance with the modern Left and pointing out that a major threat to America today is - drum roll please - Dungeons and Dragons!  I can almost conjure images of Russ on the set of the 700 Club next to Pat Robertson on this one.  Fantasy Roleplaying is hurting America!

That's as much a costless slab of meat for the more traditional supporters of Russ - and he still has them - as anything.  In recent years, his pronouncements have begun to make some who have stood by him a bit uneasy.  His claim that Evangelicals, being the racists we know they are, never cared about the unborn but used abortion to attack Jimmy Carter for daring to oppose racism, raised more than a few eyebrows.   

Likewise, his ardent anti-Trump rhetoric, in which he insisted that almost all support for Trump was from hypocritical fascist sexist Christians, ruffled more than a couple feathers.  It's worth noting that his famous 'Evangelicals are now what they once warned us about' quote deftly ignores the glaring hypocrisy of the Left in its condemnation of Trump over sexual behavior.  But that's a court prophet for you.

Just like this swipe at Dungeons and Dragons. He assuages fears of being a fundamentalist stereotype by snickering at the old 'it's of the devil!' concerns.  Instead, he says it's truly of the devil because of the terrible ways it portrays things like violence and heroism and fighting for a cause that stinks more of ancient pagan virtues than Christian ones.  

Which is likely fair.  But what he doesn't mention is that this is simply a small part of a broad pop culture attitude that can be found every bit as much in the latest Marvel movie or Disney outing as any D&D book on the dinner table. 

Why not throw all of the modern pop media culture offerings onto the fire?  Why pick on D&D?  That's what Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell would do. Like them or not, they didn't just stop with screaming at D&D, but would launch full form against Hollywood, the whole of the entertainment industry, vast corporate interests, or anything they saw as a threat to their Christian values and understanding of the world.  

But why doesn't Russ do that?  Why single out D&D?   Because regarding D&D, even in 'the age of the Geek' when geekdom and nerdiness are mainstream and even powerful, the old stereotypes that emerged from media brainwashing in the 80s still apply.  So it's an easy target.  It's what old timers called 'shooting cripples.'  Attack something that will cost nothing in return. 

But Marvel Studios?  Disney?  Modern Hollywood?  The general media culture of our day?  That's where the money is.  Buck such outlets and you might just loose those cushy dinner parties and media events hobnobbing with the beautiful people.  And we can't have that.

So just throw out a little slab of meat to the uneasy in your more traditional camps.  And make darn sure to ignore the donkey in the living room, since that might jeopardize your next media dinner party.  Look at the D&D in my hand, not the cozy relationship with vast powers opposed to the Faith in the other.   A little sleight of hand, a bit of the old distraction, but that's how it needs to be done.  For now at least.     

17 comments:

  1. Does Russ Moore have a notable following? Only asking as I have no idea who he is.
    My impression though, regarding Evangelicals, is that their camps are kind of imploding. Without the structure of a semi-supportive culture and a cohesive moral framework, what exactly are they passing on to their children to uphold? Especially when there's so many individualistic interpretations of scripture and moral permissibility of behavior and a warped understanding of empathy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Russ was a student when I was in seminary. He had contacts and was quickly set as Dr. Mohler's assistant. He soon became part of denominational offices and was emerging as a big name in the whole of the Southern Baptist Convention by the late 90s. In those days of the Mohler revolution, it was Calvinism and conservatism all the way. There was no Christianity apart from the label 'conservative.' If he was as critical of such back then, he must have kept it quiet whenever I was around. When Bush won in 2000, Russ became one of the voices saying it was time to seal the deal and bring the culture wars to a final victory. But by the end of the Bush years, it was easy to see him beginning to adopt a more critical tone towards the 'religious right', including mocking people for those silly culture wars. He eventually became head of several SBC agencies, including its ethics commission. During that time he became quite a favorite with President Obama's White House. In 2016, he made news when he blasted Trump and Trump's supporters, quipping his oft quoted line 'Evangelicals are now what religious conservatives once warned us about.' Ignoring, of course, the hypocrisy of the post-Clinton left's sudden obsession with sexual ethics again. But Trump won, and Russ ceased being the headline news he was during the campaign. Yet he has increasingly warmed more and more to the Left. His 'not weddings but receptions' nod to the LGTBQ community shocked some in his traditional camp (since, believe it or not, not all conservative Evangelicals are Trump fans). Then last year, from what I know of those who still follow that group, he stunned many by affirming the claim that Evangelicals never cared about the unborn, they just supported racism. During this time, he and Beth Moore (no relation) formally left the SBC, after both insisted the whole denomination was just awash in racism, sexism, corruption and bigotry. How much he still maintains that 'old time Evangelical at heart' persona I'm not sure. But taking such a laughable swipe at RPGs would appeal to nobody and mean nothing to anyone in the modern secular court. It has to be a nod to the more traditional base he used to enjoy.

      Delete
    2. Interesting! Thank you for enlightening me!
      And I just read that article. What an utter and complete joke! To tie role playing games into “Jan. 6” as a conclusion of them? ... He completely lost me to his possibility of making some sort of actual reasonable point.
      The culture wars were lost in our churches though. At least in my opinion. I just listened to a First Things podcast with David Ayers (so?) called Single, Christian, and Chaste? That was eye opening on the Evangelical front. I’m well acquainted with the subversive Catholic stuff that has come through the last 50 years. But add feminism, adultery, divorce, and general promiscuity to the mix... our families have been devastated and sent out not disciples or apostles but wounded souls with a bitter dislike of faith and religion.

      Delete
    3. I think we dropped the ball when we imagined there was some neutral ground where we could compromise and meet others halfway. There really isn't. For many reasons, we decided to adopt that live and let live attitude, imagining that the movement pushing it was honor bound to live by it. That is obviously something that didn't pan out. And all the while, we allowed forces arrayed against the Faith and its presence in the world to attack and eliminate the Christian witness. Now we see the results.

      Delete
  2. Moore, much like David French and Steven Greydanus, is a ninny by nature, so he's always looking for something to condemn. But he can't criticize the entertainment industry's newfound obsession with black ethno-narcissism and transgenderism. That would upset his largely left-wing readership. So he bashes Dungeons & Dragons. Who knows? Maybe it'll help him curry favor with the religious right, which used to antagonize fantasy franchises like DND, Harry Potter, and the like.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, condemning is something that defines the modern era. It's what we do. I do think if someone cured cancer tomorrow, we'd find something to criticize. But you're right. People who want to keep partying at the Forum don't dare criticize the sacred cows of the modern Left, including the corporate interests that are promoting it. So in this case, you target some little thing that might resonate among that traditional base, without jeopardizing the good reputation you have at the best parties. What you say is exactly what is happening.

      Delete
    2. D&D is a safe target. The wokesters have deemed the orcs problematic because they remind them of black people (I wish I were kidding), so Moore isn't risking anything by bashing that franchise. It's for that same reason that Christian squishes feel comfortable attacking Harry Potter. J.K. Rowling was mean to the trannies, so that franchise is fair game now.

      Delete
  3. I know you don't keep up with these things, Dave (because you have so much more important stuff to worry about - and none of the above is sarcastic), but it probably helps that of lately, Wizards of the Coast, the makers of D&D, have been in a lot of hot water for some things that have angered a LOT of their fans and customers. Not even strictly on politics either - I mean left and right leaning fans BOTH are all mad at the company. Like changing the original OGL which... is complicated but basically it had the potential to screw over a lot of small creators & participants in the D&D community.

    So it makes you wonder... is he really going after D&D for any particular principle reason, or more because it is a "safe" target right now as everybody is mad at it for a variety of reasons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Russ who?

      Delete
    2. That could be. I remember my sons talking about that. I don't know when Russ wrote the piece. Christianity Today released it in a way I thought was referencing an already published piece, but perhaps he was thinking that. In any event, you're right and that's my point. This is bravely charging forth and killing those koala bears, rather than deal with the leftwing grizzly bears he wants to party with. Expect more of the same in the coming years I'm afraid (hence the stunning silence from so much of the Christian community as the trans activists go from 'it's a lie, we would never perform surgery on minors!', to 'it's a lie, we would never perform surgery on children!' - note the change in terminology).

      Delete
    3. David, he's still somewhat notable in Protestant/Evangelical circles.

      Delete
    4. Only in the sense that "David French is still somewhat notable in conservative / evangelical circles". Notable for leaving people irked, bored, and impatient. Every time.

      Delete
    5. I gather analogy is not your strong suit.

      Delete
    6. Well, if the analogy is correct. Russ still has a substantial following among people who otherwise would not approve of where Russ is actually going. But in Evangelical circles, at least among those I still know, he seems far more accepted than French among conservative circles, who seems to have lost quite a lot of his past following.

      Delete
  4. A century ago the proto-Evangelical John Gresham Machen made a distinction between Christians he disagreed with, on the one hand, and pretend Christians on the other. Thus, he would gladly extend the hand of Christian fellowship to sincere Catholics while refusing to extend it to liberal Christians. In his view, Catholics were fellow Christians whom he disagreed with on some points; liberal Christians were adherents of a different religion altogether, even though they made use of Christian symbols and language to advance their alien creed. They were cross-dressing pagans, so to speak. I see things pretty much the way Machen did, only as a Catholic rather than as a Protestant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That was the thinking that opened up the door for looking at Catholicism. Ironically as Dr. Mohler and his supporters were slamming the door on dialogue with Catholics at that time, I was beginning to look into the Church more seriously.

      Delete

Let me know your thoughts