- Are we sure there is overwhelming scientific consensus on just why people are homosexual?
- Does a physiological tendency toward a behavior make that behavior no longer subject to moral examination?
- Does the physiological tendency toward a behavior mean that any negative results of that behavior are to be ignored?
- Just how much actual proof do we have regarding homosexuality, and how much of it is based on biases, interpretation of data, and personal perspectives?
So the question, rhetorical as it may seem, still stands: why this treatment for heavy people, many of whom may be physiologically and biologically predisposed toward being heavy, while folks who follow another particular lifestyle on the single platform of it being physiological/biological are given a free pass, a 'don't touch this', a conform or else message?
My answer to that will follow someday.