So I noticed something. In the months following the election of Pope Francis, the news media lit up like a solar flare. This was especially true after his famous 'who am I to judge' remark about the LGTBQ movement. Every week, if not every day, there seemed to be stories about Pope Francis. All of which gushed with praise and adoration and optimism about how Pope Francis was beginning the good work of finally burning that old time religion to the ground. For example, this one always comes to mind, from the rag dedicated to proselytizing our youngest into a world of Sodom and Gomorrah debauchery and nihilism:
That was just part of the new age of post-modern propaganda that rotated around Pope Francis like a hurricane. Reminds you of the messianic visions of Obama in 2008, don't it.
Anyway, I notice in comparison to that, the press has been rather quiet about Pope Leo XIV. But so has everyone else. Certainly in comparison to the almost daily posts unpacking the latest Pope Francis interview or talking point. Oh, people mention Pope Leo here and there. For instance, those of more traditional sympathies noted that on June 1st, otherwise known as our last month long foray into post-Christian paganism and dreams of a post-Western world for the year, Pope Leo chose to talk about families and mom and dad and having those babies.
So naturally, this is what I saw after June 1st on most media outlets that bothered to mention him at all:
![]() |
At least Vatican News added the family admonition to the important news |
Over at Where Peter Is, where every word that proceeded from the mouth of Francis seemed to warrant its own special column (except his trashing of transgender activism), I saw no mention of his June 1st musings. Just a column reflecting on how Pope Leo can effectively continue the reforms and activism of Pope Francis, and one reflecting on the real meaning of his emphasis on unity.
Whether it's the Church righting itself, or people wanting to refrain from rushing in, or what, I don't know. Clearly Pope Leo is not what the press initially hoped or imagined. By now we know that thing we used to call the news media is merely tabloid propaganda. They have no desire to cover news, merely promote. And so far, it seems whatever they want to promote and what they see in Pope Leo XIV are not one and the same. At least it looks that ways thus far. So we'll see. Just something I've noticed.
For a bonus giggle, here is a Youtube video (posted on WPI) in which we realize Pope Leo and Pope Francis will be, well, the same but with different name tags. And unity properly understood is when we realize it's the fault of those traditionalists and more conservative types misreading what Pope Leo no doubt intends to mean:
Heh. That sort of thing always makes me chuckle. The old leftwing trick of asking why can't conservatives stop being so damn divisive and just admit it's all their fault. I find the stunning lack of self-awareness among those, including Christians, who tack Left is usually the most amazing thing. And most annoying.